The stop of the Trump cuts for medical research is extended nationwide

A federal judge ordered the Trump government to claim a plan that would reduce the research financing of $ 4 billion at universities, cancer centers and hospitals in the country.

The funds paid by the National Institutes of Health of Health cover the administrative and overhead costs for a huge part of biomedical research, some of which are aimed at addressing diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer and diabetes.

The command was issued by Judge Angel Kelley for the US district court in Boston late Monday evening in response to a lawsuit that was submitted by university associations and large research centers, in which it was argued that the “obvious action” of US health officers “medical Research ”will be at America’s universities. “

The temporary injunction from Richter Kelley, a bida officer, expanded a similar arrangement that was granted on Monday after almost two dozen lawyers sued General lawyers to stop the cuts in their states.

The Trump administration’s plan, to the agreed payments that universities and health systems receive for the support of research results, shaked the academic medical world when it was abruptly announced on Friday.

Academic researchers and university officials predicted that the plan ceases valuable studies, cost thousands of jobs and the United States kneeled in competitive efforts to achieve medical breakthroughs.

The plan was at 9 billion US dollars of the grants of $ 35 billion in research institutions. The quarter of the entire research financing supports so -called indirect costs that apply to expenditure on administrative expenses, including personnel and building operations and laboratory operation and maintenance.

The Trump government said that it wanted to reduce such funds in about 4 billion US dollars in approximately in half.

The financing of overhead costs has been criticized in the past. And the resistance to the funds was created in the 2025 draft for conservative politics, which indicates that the NIH research financing provided too much support to the “left” universities.

On Friday, Katie Miller, a member of Elon Musk’s efforts, released the greatness of the federal government on social media: “President Trump dismisses the Slush Fund of the Liberal Dean.”

Universities have a very different view. The funds support scientific breakthroughs that “become more frequently and more consistent,” said Dr. Alan M. Garber, President of Harvard University, in a statement on Sunday.

“In a time faster progress in quantum computing, artificial intelligence, brain science, biological imaging and regenerative biology, and if other nations expand their investments in science, America should not knowingly and willingly fall from its main position at the endless border, said Dr. Garber.

The plaintiffs, including the Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, claim that the sudden funding “Chaos encourage critical research” and ultimately forced the universities to interpret employees, to conclude laboratories and to close certain research programs , switch off overall.

In a legal memo in connection with the lawsuit, the universities argued that the funds in research, including in institutions in which laboratory trials go through clinical tests, for the computer systems that analyze large amounts of data, for blood banks and other costs that are not direct can be bound to a single project.

If the financing cuts survived legal challenges, the plaintiffs wrote: “Research laboratories would literally become dark because there is a lack of electricity.”

Smaller institutions, they argued, could possibly not maintain research and “completely close”.

The congress thwarted earlier efforts in the first term of office of President Trump to reduce indirect research financing. The legislator added budget calculations to ensure that the funds remained at the level agreed by researchers and federal officials.

In the lawsuit, the union of the universities argued that the current proposal violated the will of the congress and also opposed the standard administration procedure.

When granting the temporary stop at the cuts, judge Kelley decided that the plaintiffs “would suffer immediate and irreparable injuries”.

A note was determined for February 21.